< Back
to Meeting Archives
Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership
Steering Committee Meeting
February 15, 2005
Attendees:
Hayden Street, John Dohrmann, James Schroeder, Jacques White,
Linda Hanson (for Doug Osterman), Toni Lick, Debby Hyde, Dick
Ecker, Curtis Tanner, Tim Smith, Rob Koeppen, Jen Steger,
and Debbie Rick
Executive Committee De-Briefing
The Federal and Local Project Managers presented on the progress
of the General Investigation under the Puget Sound Nearshore
Ecosystem Restoration Project (PSNERP). This included the
Status of the Work Plan, Budget to date and expected expenditures
for completion of Stage 2, and a schedule for completion of
Stage 2. The Project has significant challenges ahead. Estimated
budget for completion of Stage 2 is $3,410,254, with unallocated
FY06 resources of ($243,201) for a total FY 2007 unmet need
of $3,167,053. Funding at this level is necessary to complete
Stage 2, by the target date of September 2007.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION: Develop a Plan B Funding Plan
Puget Sound Partnership – Puget Sound
Initiative
Bill Ruckelshaus and Brad Ack provided a panel discussion
on the Governor’s Puget Sound Initiative and the Puget
Sound Partnership. Governor Gregoire has asked nine regional
leaders to provide initial leadership for this effort. Bill
Ruckelshaus is one of the nine. The Governor has provided
a list of five charges and requested a report on these by
October 2006. The Project Managers for this Partnership are
Brad Ack (Puget Sound Action Team) and Jim Kramer (Shared
Strategy for Puget Sound).
The Governor’s Initiative could not have come at a
more opportune time for the Nearshore Partnership. With the
momentum created by the Initiative, Brad and Bill encouraged
the Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership to engage with the Puget
Sound Partnership.
- How we might help
Assimilate our products, materials before deadline
Strategic Plans due the end of May
Use our science
- How we might fit in
Seat at the table
Integrate our “stuff” under each of the five
charges
We want the Puget Sound Partnership to say the Nearshore
Partnership is it.
- Materials we can provide
Implementation Criteria
Project Lists (what we know about each/test the hypothesis)
by September or criteria to implement projects.
STEERING COMMITTEE ACTION: “Five Charges”
Workgroup; Debby Hyde, Jacques White, John Dohrmann, Curtis
Tanner to meet to examine each of the five charges and
what contribution the Nearshore Partnership offer towards
meeting the charges and how it can strategically assist
the Puget Sound Partnership. Report back at March Steering
Committee.
Federal Request “one-pagers” (attached)
Tim Smith shared with the Steering Committee several one-pagers
he developed to address each of the federal requests: Corps
of Engineers -Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration
Project - $1.9 million, Environmental Protection Agency -
Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem: Future Without Project Condition
Report $525,000, Corps of Engineers - Puget Sound and Adjacent
Waters Restoration (PSAW) - $5 million, US Geological Survey
- Coastal Habitats in Puget Sound - $2 million, and NOAA Fisheries
- New $ 2.000 million earmark for restoration projects in
support of the Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership.
Federal Project Manager’s Report
President’s Budget –
The FY07 Budget was released on Monday, February 6th. It
included $400K for the Nearshore General Investigation –
the only investigation proposed for Seattle District in FY07.
If Congress approves the President’s Budget, at least
five FY06 GIs involving Puget Sound watersheds will be suspended
in FY07.
Staffing Changes –
Miriam Gilmer was selected to be the Nearshore Plan Formulator,
serving as co-lead of the Implementation Team. Miriam recently
managed and completed the Puget Sound Resources Superfund
project within the nearshore of Elliot Bay. Beth Coffey, the
previous plan formulator, was selected as supervisor for Regulatory
Branch.
VEC White Paper Status Matrix Status
Scoped Research Work Order with University of Washington
through US Geological Survey including: "Values"
narrative by Tom Leschine and two graduate students. (10th
VEC White Paper).
Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters Restoration
Program
- Skokomish Estuary Restoration Project Decision Document
- approved
- Lake Washington Gravel Nourishment Decision Document
- approval pending completed environmental consultation
- Proposed FY’07-‘08 nearshore projects under
consideration:
- Nisqually River Estuary
- Snohomish River Estuary
- Skokomish River Estuary (Phase II)
Local Project Managers’ Report
Executive Committee Meeting: Overall the Executive Committee
was very successful. The members have a better understanding
of the PSNERP approach and support it. The members recognized
the difficult choices ahead if funding continues to lag.
PRISM Design Team
- Provided final input on security and other design elements
- Completed “look up tables” with goals/objective,
VECs and other details
- Determined sequence for data base development tasks –
“mandatory”, “2nd tier”, “future”
- Provided Nearshore Projects Database to PRISM design
team
- Beta version of PRISM Nearshore database currently in
testing
Nearshore Partnership information Materials
- Program description one-pager
- Technical documents one-pagers
Curtis gave presentation on the PSNERP GI to Regional and
National Coastal Program staff at the USFWS Region 1 (WA,
OR, CA, HI) Coastal Program Meeting.
Finally, Curtis identified his near-term (next six months)
workload priorities for advancing the GI study:
1. Completion of change analysis methods and development
of a work plan to complete Sound-wide change analysis.
2. Complete of VEC White Paper series, including peer-review
and publication.
3. Completion of a pilot Strategic Needs Assessment Report
for WRIA 9.
4. Completion of Management Measure technical report series.
5. Update PSNERP Work Plan, including additional details
on Stage 3 tasks and schedule.
6. Resolution on Future Without Project methods.
The Steering Committee agreed with these priorities. Tim
Smith suggested some additional tasks, including:
1. Work towards identification of Contractor for Stage
3 product delivery
2. Scope role of IT/NST in Stage 3
3. Resolve any outstanding issues with Federal Project
Manager on qualifying local match.
Next Meeting
March 15, 2006 @ Pierce County Environmental Services
Draft Agenda
Tom Leschine Brief on VECs with Value Component
“Charges” Workgroup Report
STATE OF WASHINGTON
FY 2007 Federal Appropriation Request Sheet
House Subcommittee: Energy and Water
Senate Subcommittee: Energy and Water
Federal Agency: Corps of Engineers - Civil
Bill Title, Program Account Name: Title I General Investigation
Project or Program Name: Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem
Restoration Project
Project or Program Explanation:
The Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project (PSNERP)
is a 5-6 year, $12 million “general investigation”
designed to meet the feasibility requirements for the Corps
ecosystem restoration “construction general” program.
The investigation is a 50/50 cost share between the federal
government and local sponsors, represented by the Department
of Fish and Wildlife. If fully funded, this request would
complete the federal contribution to the study portion of
the project (Stage II) and leave just the Final Feasibility
Report (Stage III) unfunded. Governor Gregoire’s FY
06 supplemental budget request includes $.500k to help meet
the local cost-share requirements of this G.I.
FY 2006 Funding Level: $ 750,000
FY 2007 President Budget: $ 400,000 (Washington State’s
only GI project…)
FY 2007 State Funding Request: $1.9 million
Authorization: Public Law 106-60; September 29, 1999
Report Language Request: None needed
For more information: Tim Smith, WDFW
360/561-9781 (cell)
smithtrs@dfw.wa.gov
STATE OF WASHINGTON
FY 2007 Federal Appropriation Request Sheet
House Subcommittee: Interior and Environment
Senate Subcommittee: Transportation, Treasury, Judiciary
& HUD
Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Bill Title, Program Account Name: Office of Research and
Development, Corvallis Environmental Research Lab
Project or Program Name: Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem:
Future Without Project Condition Report
Project or Program Explanation:
A required element of the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem
Restoration Project (PSNERP) general investigation (GI) is
identification of future design alternatives. One of those
design alternatives must forecast the “Future Condition
Without the Project”. EPA, through its Research Lab
in Corvallis, Oregon has developed an international expertise
in identifying and projecting the rate of ecosystem decline
or recovery over time. This request would fulfill the requirements
of the Corps of Engineers in the PSNERP G.I.
FY 2006 Funding Level: 0
FY 2007 President Budget: 0
FY 2007 State Funding Request: $525,000
Authorization: Clean Water Act, Section 104(b); Sec. 320
Report Language Request:
“Of the amount appropriated, $525,000 shall be available
for development of a “Future Without Project”
report for the Puget Sound nearshore ecosystem. The report
shall be designed and written in consultation with the Puget
Sound Nearshore Science Team, co-chaired by the Army Corps
of Engineers and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife”
For more information: Tim Smith, WDFW
360/561-9781 (cell)
smithtrs@dfw.wa.gov
STATE OF WASHINGTON
FY 2007 Federal Appropriation Request Sheet
House Subcommittee: Energy and Water
Senate Subcommittee: Energy and Water
Agency: Corps of Engineers
Bill Title, Program Account Name: Title 1, Construction
General
Project or Program Name: Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters
(PSAW)
Project or Program Explanation:
This initiative was authorized in order to help recovery
efforts of ESA listed salmon and steelhead runs. These funds
allow the Corps to begin a habitat restoration program throughout
the Puget Sound basin. The initiative is structured to ensure
that projects are done in close consultation with local, state,
federal, and tribal interests. The focus is to undertake restoration
work that will take advantage of the Corps’ expertise
and capacity for construction projects. Current projects funded
through PSAW include Seahurst Park shoreline restoration;
Skokomish River estuary dike removal; North Puget Sound derelict
gear removal. Governor Gregoire’s FY 06 Supplemental
budget request proposed $2.5 million state capital funds for
a new program in the Department of Fish and Wildlife, “Estuary
and Salmon Recovery in Puget Sound”. This new program
will help provide local cash match for PSAW projects (as well
as other federal construction and restoration programs).
FY 2006 Funding Level: $1.5 million
FY 2007 President Budget: $0 (OMB has not yet completed
it’s review and approval of the program guidance)
FY 2007 State Funding Request: $5.0 million
Authorization: P.L. 103-231
Report Language Request: None
For more information: Tim Smith, WDFW
360/561-9781 (cell)
smithtrs@dfw.wa.gov
STATE OF WASHINGTON
FY 2007 Federal Appropriation Request Sheet
House Subcommittee: Interior and Environment
Senate Subcommittee: Interior
Federal Agency: U.S. Geological Survey
Bill Title, Program Account Name: Coastal Marine Geology
Program
Project or Program Name: Coastal Habitats in Puget Sound
Project or Program Explanation:
This ongoing USGS work on Puget Sound represents a multi-discisciplinary
science effort, including the four USGS science disciplines
implementing the USGS coastal plan. The USGS Coastal Habitats
in Puget Sound (CHIPS) process involves coordination and collaboration
with numerous stakeholders and partners in the Pacific Northwest.
USGS has led development of a research plan in support of
the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project (PSNERP).
In 2006, USGS began implementing a portion of the plan through
the Coastal Habitats in Puget Sound (CHIPS) program. USGS
has begun targeted research related to the restoration of
nearshore natural processes. Pilot areas have been the Elwha
River estuary (restoration related to dam removal); the Skagit
River delta (restoration of natural processes related to dike
removal); and Urbanized Shoreline (restoration of natural
processes related to geomorphic impacts). This request would
allow the USGS expand the scope of its research. Findings
will inform and advise completion of the PSNERP GI and guide
implementation of nearshore restoration projects.
FY 2006 Funding Level: $ 500,000
FY 2007 President Budget: $ 500,000
FY 2007 State Funding Request: $2.0 million
Authorization: Organic Act of 1879, 43 U.S.C. 31, 43 U.S.C.
36c; Public Law 102-285; and National Geologic Mapping Act
of 1992, to provide the science for managers of natural
resources.
Report Language Request: None needed
For more information: Tim Smith, WDFW
360/561-9781 (cell)
smithtrs@dfw.wa.gov
STATE OF WASHINGTON
FY 2007 Federal Appropriation Request Sheet
House Subcommittee: Science, State, Justice and Commerce
Senate Subcommittee: Commerce, Justice, and Science
Federal Agency: NOAA Fisheries
Bill Title, Program Account Name: Habitat Conservation
and Restoration
Project or Program Name: Community-based Restoration Program
Project or Program Explanation:
NOAA’s Community-based Restoration program provides
financial and technical assistance to local, state and tribal
partners for projects that restore important marine and coastal
habitats. Currently in Washington State, CRP is supporting
Olympia oyster beach restoration and derelict gear removal.
Funds proposed would be used to match funding proposed by
Governor Gregoire through the “Estuary and Salmon Recovery
in Puget Sound” program, as well as other state and
local fund sources.
FY 2006 Funding Level: $13.0 million (additional $6.8 “earmarked”)
FY 2007 President Budget: $12.8 million
FY 2007 State Funding Request: New $ 2.000 million earmark
for restoration
projects in support of the Puget Sound Nearshore Partnership.
Authorization: Fish and Wildlife Coordinating Act
16 U.S.C. 661
Report Language Request:
“$2,000,000 for marine and coastal restoration projects
implemented in cooperation with the Puget Sound Nearshore
Partnership”.
For more information: Tim Smith, WDFW
360/561-9781 (cell)
smithtrs@dfw.wa.gov
|