Technical Reports

 

Program Documents

 

Fact Sheets

Expedited Reconnaissance Study
Section 905(b) (WRDA 86) Analysis

Puget Sound Nearshore Marine Habitat Restoration Study

1. Study Authority: The Puget Sound Nearshore Restoration Project was initiated as a Corps of Engineers Civil, Title 1 General Investigation study under Public Law 106-60 (29 September 1999). This authority states:

The following appropriations shall be expended under the direction of the Secretary of the Army and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers for authorized civil functions of the Department of Army pertaining to rivers and harbors, flood control, beach erosion, and related purposes.

General Investigation funds are used for the collection and study of basic information pertaining to rivers and harbors, flood control, shore protection and related projects, restudy of authorized projects, miscellaneous investigations, and, when authorized by laws, surveys and detailed studies and plans and specifications of projects prior to construction.

2. Study Purpose: This report is a preliminary analysis to determine if there is a federal (Corps) interest in pursuing a feasibility study related to ecosystem restoration in the nearshore environments of central Puget Sound. Once restoration opportunities have been identified, the Corps will work with local governments to determine which measures and/or projects warrant further study effort in the feasibility phase. For those potential projects, a Project Management Plan (PMP) will be developed to conduct further feasibility studies, and a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) will be coordinated with the current local sponsors: King County, and City of Burien. The primary area of consideration is to address environmental restoration projects in the nearshore environment of central Puget Sound. This analysis is in accordance with the guidelines of Section 905(b) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986.

3. Location of Study, Non-Federal Sponsor and Congressional Districts

a) The study area is located in the nearshore environment of central Puget Sound in Washington State (Figure 1). Possible restoration sites include:

1. Shilshole Bay at the mouth of the Hiram Chittenden Locks within the City of Seattle in King County;

2. Seahurst Park in the City of Burien in King County;

3. Dumas Bay in the City of Federal Way in King County;

4. The nearshore coastline of Kitsap County;

5. The nearshore coastline of King County, north of the City of Seattle; and

6. A series of programmatic projects including but not limited to: restoration of estuaries, creation of wetlands, rehabilitation of public abutments, softening of beach fronts along private properties, and utilization of slide material for use as source material into the Puget Sound nearshore.

b) The current non-Federal sponsors for the feasibility phase of the study are King County, and the City of Burien. In addition, both Kitsap and Island County and the City of Seattle have expressed interest in the GI study, and also may participate as local sponsors at a later date.

c)  The study area lies within the 1st, 6th, 7th, and 9th Congressional Districts.

4. Discussion of Prior Studies And Existing Water Resource Projects: The only previous studies done in the proposed project areas have been associated with the Lake Washington Ship Canal and the Hiram A. Chittenden Locks.

a) The Lake Washington Ship Canal. This project was completed in 1916. The authorized project purpose is navigation. The 8-mile long Lake Washington Ship Canal links Puget Sound with fresh waters of Salmon Bay, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. The Hiram A. Chittenden Locks provide the navigable connection between salt and fresh waters and controls the elevation of the Lake Washington drainage basin to Puget Sound. Fish passage was provided to mitigate for the loss of a stream to the project. The fish ladder and locks enable adult anadromous fish passage from salt to fresh water. A movable saltwater barrier, located in the large lock, reduces saltwater intrusion into Lake Washington during lock operations. The saltwater drain located near the upstream end of the large lock, returns much of the saltwater to Puget Sound via the original spillway outlet located adjacent to the small lock and through the fish ladder as attraction flows.

b) The Lake Washington Basin Restoration Study. This current feasibility study is evaluating two water-related issues in the greater Lake Washington Basin, which includes Lake Sammamish, Lake Washington, and the Cedar River. These issues are: improved salmonid migration and survival at the Hiram A. Chittenden Locks through water conservation and the modification of facilities, and the creation of specific habitat improvements throughout the basin for fish and wildlife. The listing of Puget Sound chinook and Puget Sound bull trout as threatened species has strengthened the need for specific habitat projects in the basin.

c)  The Green Duwamish River Ecosystem Restoration Project. The final feasibility report recommended 45 site specific and programmatic restoration sites in the Green Duwamish River Basin. The recommended sites were selected to address several limiting factors within the Green/Duwamish River basin. The sites vary from stream restoration projects high up in the basin to habitat restoration in Elliot Bay at the bottom end of the river system. WRDA 2000 authorized $115 million for implementation of this project over a 10-year timeframe.

5. Plan Formulation:

(a) Identified Problems: The proposed study would evaluate degradation and loss of estuarine and nearshore habitat necessary to the support critical fish and wildlife populations in the central Puget Sound environment.

Historic and current development along the Puget Sound shoreline has resulted in a significant loss in estuarine and nearshore habitats. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources estimates that almost 80% of the original eastern nearshore habitat of Puget Sound’s central basin (King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties) has been modified through the construction of bulkheads and docks, filling of intertidal habitat, and removal of shoreline vegetation. Changes in physical structure have resulted in losses which include loss of shade, reduction in leaf fall, which limits terrestrial food sources and nutrient inputs; lowering of the beach profile; coarsening of beach sediment; narrowing of the beach; loss of area through dredging and filling; and the alteration of groundwater flows. The direct link between physical conditions and habitat, and habitat and biological resources have resulted in significant impacts to critical fish and wildlife resources, including habitat that supports all species of salmonids. Remnant habitat patches have now become critical support features to remaining fish and wildlife populations, including two threatened salmonid species (chinook salmon and bull trout).

There are several factors that effect the character of the nearshore and its related habitat functions. Factors include the extent of armoring, structures within the nearshore environment, sources of sediments, the extent of past modifications, and littoral drift patterns. The needs and projects within the Puget Sound nearshore specifically relate to shoreline process restoration or rehabilitation. The project would focus on the following types or needs:

  • Restoration of historic shoreline processes;
  • Beach nourishment;
  • Removal of armoring or structure setbacks;
  • Alternative ‘processes friendly’ erosion protection measures; and
  • Sustainable measures.

Review of past restoration projects clearly demonstrates the benefits of creating and/or restoring functioning estuarine habitat to the nearshore environment. This investigation would identify restoration projects intended to maximize estuarine and nearshore functions.

Existing Conditions
Existing studies have documented a 73 percent decline in the area of Puget Sound covered by intertidal salt marshes. Nearly all of this loss is associated with modifications of river deltas within major urban areas. Direct loss to nearshore environments outside of major river deltas has not been as well documented. Additionally, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources estimates that one-third of Puget Sound’s shoreline – approximately 800 miles – has been modified by human development. Central Puget Sound, with the basin’s highe